北京理工大學26申博英語預測作文：

AI作為合著者：學術誠信的福音還是災難?

題目：AI as a Co-author: Boon or Bane for Academic Integrity?

范文：

The integration of Artificial intelligence as a writing tool in academia hasignited a fierce debate concerning its impact on scholarly integrity. Proponentshail AI's ability to enhance efficiency, while critics warn it may erode the veryessence of original thought. in my view, AI should be recognized strictly as asophisticated tool, and its use must be governed by transparent ethicalprotocols to prevent it from becoming a threat to integrity.

Undoubtedly, AI offers tremendous benefits. lt can process vast literaturerapidly, suggesting relevant sources and identifying gaps, which significantlyexpedites the initial research phase. For instance, tools like GPT-basedassistants can help non-native English scholars structure arguments and polishlanguage, thereby lowering linguistic barriers and promoting global academicdialogue.This democratizing potential allows researchers to focus more oninnovative ideas rather than mechanical writing tasks.

However, the over-reliance on AI carries profound risks. The most significantdanger is intellectual atrophy-the gradual decline of critical thinking anddeep analytical skills when researchers outsource the synthesis of ideas toalgorithms.Furthermore, the line between legitimate assistance andplagiarism becomes blurred when AI generates content that is not properlyverified or credited. lf undisclosed, this practice constitutes a serious breach ofauthenticity, undermining the trust that academic communication relies upon.

Therefore, the solution lies not in prohibition but in rigorous AIgorithmicaccountability, Academic institutions must establish clear guidelines requiringthe declaration of AI assistance, specifying its role in ideation, drafting, orediting.Simultaneously, the core mission of doctoral training must remain thecultivation of independent, critical intellects capable of using tools wiselywithout being subservient to them. Only through such a bAIanced approachcan we harness the boon of AI while steadfastly avciding its potential to become a bane.

中文譯文：

人工智能作為寫作工具融入學術界，引發了一場關于其如何影響學術誠信的激烈辯論。支持者贊揚其提升效率的能力，而批評者警告它可能侵蝕原創思想的本質。在我看來，AI應被嚴格界定為一種高級工具，其使用必須受透明的倫理規范約束，以防止其成為誠信的威脅。

毫無疑問，AI帶來了巨大好處。它能快速處理海量文獻，推薦相關資源并找出研究空白，這極大加快了初期研究進程。例如，基于GPT的輔助工具可以幫助非英語母語的學者構建論點、潤色語言，從而降低語言障礙，促進全球學術對話。這種民主化的潛力讓研究者能更專注于創新思想，而非機械的寫作任務。

然而，過度依賴AI會帶來深遠風險。最重大的危險是思想惰性--當研究者將觀點綜合的任務外包給算法時，批判性思維和深度分析能力會逐漸退化。此外，當AI生成的內容未被妥善驗證或注明來源時，合理輔助與抄襲之間的界限便模糊了。若未加以披露，這種行為便構成了對學術真實性的嚴重破壞，動搖了學術交流所依賴的信任基礎。

因此，解決之道在于算法問責而非全面禁止。學術機構必須制定明確指南，要求研究者聲明AI輔助的程度與范圍，具體說明其在構思、起草或編輯中的作用。同時博士培養的核心使命，必須始終是培育能夠明智使用工具而非受其支配的、獨立的批判性智力。唯有通過這種平衡之道，我們才能利用AI的福音，同時堅定地避免其潛在的災難。